This is a second appeal from the high court
sitting as an appellate court from a decision of
the grade one magistrate. The appellants in the
high court were the plaintiffs in the lower court
and had sued the respondent for unlawful
interference with their rights as tenants by
occupancy. They sought a permanent
injunction which was denied hence the appeal
to the high court which was allowed hence this
further appeal on the grounds of improper
evaluation of the evidence, failure to visit the
locus in quo and hence occasioned a
miscarriage of justice and the holding that the
respondents acquired an interest in the
development of the suit land and were lawful
occupants.
