In this case the applicant sought to court for issuance of revision orders against the
orders of the lower court delivered in a former miscellaneous application.
Headnote and Holding:
Court considered whether the order of revision should be issued against the orders of
the lower court as prayed by the applicant. Court held it could not issue the order for
revision. Court was satisfied from its findings that the lower court had jurisdiction to
handle the matter which was well exercised. A wrong interpretation of the law of fact
cannot be subject of revision as long as the correct jurisdiction has been exercised by
court judiciously
Accordingly court dismissed the applicant’s application for judicial review.
