From the evidence that was adduced, it was found that there were some contradictions in the evidence of both parties, which contradictions were minor and did not relate to the issues.
It was further held that the trail judge did not properly evaluate the evidence in the case as a whole, thereby reaching an unfair decision.
Further, the court found that the appellant’s signatures on the transactions of registration were forged, and thus, the registration of the respondent was fraudulent.
Accordingly, the appeal was allowed with prayers granted to the appellant.