Documentary Evidence

Mugala v Kiroko (HCT-04-CV-CA-0053-2012) [2016] UGHCLD 36 (15 November 2016);

Flynote: 

Search Summary: 

This is an appeal by the appellant being dissatisfied with the orders of the trial Magistrate on grounds that the learned trial magistrate erred in law when he failed to properly evaluate the evidence on record and that he was biased in disregarding the evidence found on the locus.

Headnote and Holding: 

The Court in its finding held that there was no sufficient evidence led by the plaintiff in court to prove that he possessed the land in question at the time of filing the suit.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Documentary Evidence