With regard to the claim for unlawful suspension from duty, the court found that there is no enforceable employment contract existing between the plaintiff and the defendant the breach of which can be tried by this court. As regards the claim for defamation, the court found that the plaintiff did not plead any of the words he considers to be defamatory. The court added that the plaint does not allege persons or at least the category of persons to whom the publication complained of was made nor that the words uttered were false and that they were published maliciously. In the final result, the court held that preliminary objection is sustainedand found that suit is incompetent and it is hereby struck out.
