Court considered whether there had been admission of liability entitling plaintiffs to
get judgment. Court held that there had been admission internally admitting liability
by defendant. Court was satisfied from its findings that the defendant had admitted

liability in an internal memo and for that matter it could not purport not to pay the
plaintiffs yet an agreement had been reached to pay. For that matter the plaintiffs were
entitled to terminal benefits as had been awarded in the out gone case involving part of
the plaintiffs in this case and payment was to be in terms of that former case.
Accordingly court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.