When the case came for hearing the learned counsel
appearing for the defendant raised a preliminary point of
law hence this ruling to resolve the matter. He submitted
that it was alleged in the plaint that the plaintiffs were a
Uganda company as per pargraph3 but that was not true.
Court ruled that the plaintiff company should be accorded
an opportunity to present its case. The question whether
they did or did not apply for repossession of the premises

whin the prescribed period that should not debar it from
the pursuit of its rights. The dispute should be
investigating and decided on merits after evidence has
been led.
Court accordingly overruled the preliminary objection.