Arbitration Award

Roko Construction Ltd v Mohammed Mohammed Hamid (CIVIL APPEAL NO.51 OF 2011) [2012] UGCA 27 (20 September 2012);

Flynote: 

Headnote and Holding: 

The court considered whether the appellant has a right in law to lodge the appeal.

The court held that there is no right of appeal against a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction unless that right is expressly provided for by statute. Further, an application brought to the High Court in terms of s 16(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is final and not subject to appeal.

The court found that the facts of the subject of the preliminary objection to the arbitrator's decision, the application by the respondent to the high court and the decision thereof fall within the ambit of s 16 of the act, therefore there is no right of appeal against the decision of the high court. Further, even under s 34 of the act there is no right of appeal against the decision of the high court. Further, there was no right to appeal in the high court because respondent did not comply with time limits, thus nullifying the order.

Accordingly, the court found that the appellant had no right of appeal, parties were ordered to pay their own costs. Further, the appellant as the successful party in the arbitration entitled to costs of the high court and arbitrator.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Arbitration Award