Actions and applications

Nakalyango Vs Nakasolya (ELECTION APPEAL No. 03 OF 2017) [2019] UGCA 13 (25 March 2019);

Flynote: 

Search Summary: 

This was a second appeal from the high court
sitting as the first appellate court in a decision
from the chief magistrate’s court. The
background is that the appellant and the
respondent contested for office in which the
respondent was returned as the validly elected.
The appellant sued successfully at the chief

magistrate’s court where the judge set aside the
return of the respondent and declared the
appellant as the validly elected plus the costs of
the suit. On appeal, the appellant was
condemned to pay a part of the costs and the
seat was instead declared vacant hence this
appeal on the grounds of denial of the costs of
the suit, nullification without justification.

Headnote and Holding: 

The court held that as the second appellate
court, it is not required to re appraise the
evidence. That on second appeal, the court is
precluded from questioning the findings of fact
of the trial court. That there was a clear
evidence of irregularity in the conduct of the
election in issue rendering the integrity of the
result of a diminished value. That the findings
of the first appellate court were based on
reason that cannot be faulted. That the award
of costs is a discretional role which must be
exercised judiciously and since all the
irregularities were committed by the electoral
commission, each party would meet their costs.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Actions and applications